Sign In | Subscribe
INSTRUCTORSCarleen EatonGrant Fraser
Start learning today, and be successful in your academic & professional career. Start Today!
Loading video...
This is a quick preview of the lesson. For full access, please Log In or Sign up.
For more information, please see full course syllabus of Algebra 2
  • Discussion

  • Study Guides

  • Practice Questions

  • Download Lecture Slides

  • Table of Contents

  • Transcription

  • Related Books

Bookmark and Share
Lecture Comments (10)

1 answer

Last reply by: Dr Carleen Eaton
Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:58 PM

Post by Christopher Lee on January 22, 2014

In the 4th step for example 1, you're missing a parentheses at the end.

1 answer

Last reply by: Dr Carleen Eaton
Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:57 PM

Post by Christopher Lee on January 22, 2014

At about 14:44, you wrote 4 log base 6 x^4, while since you used the power property, there should be no ^4.

1 answer

Last reply by: Dr Carleen Eaton
Thu Mar 27, 2014 6:56 PM

Post by Christopher Lee on January 22, 2014

At 3:41, shouldn't there be parentheses around x^2-3? Also, there should be a base of 3 when you wrote log y, otherwise it would mean it would have a base of 10.

1 answer

Last reply by: Dr Carleen Eaton
Fri Mar 1, 2013 10:50 PM

Post by Kenneth Montfort on February 26, 2013

I noticed that when you did example IV, you could get two potential factor options. If you subtracted 4x^2 from both sides, your factors end up being (2x + 3)^2, but when you leave the 4x^2 positive on the right, then your factors end up being (2x - 3)^2, why is this?

1 answer

Last reply by: Dr Carleen Eaton
Thu Feb 9, 2012 7:34 PM

Post by Edmund Mercado on February 8, 2012

Dr. Eaton:
At 27:24, did you mean that log16 (18-21)= log16 (-3) not a valid solution?

Properties of Logarithms

  • Use the properties either to convert the log of a complex expression into a combination of logs of simple expressions, or vice versa.
  • To solve a logarithmic equation, first use the properties to combine logs on each side of the equation to get an equation of the form log x = log y. Then equate x and y.

Properties of Logarithms

Simplify
log2( [(x3)/((x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4)] )
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Begin by applying property (3)
  • log2( [(x3)/((x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4)] ) = log2x3 − log2(x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4
  • On the first term, apply property (2)
  • 3log2x − log2(x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4
  • First half is done, now apply property (1) to the second term
  • 3log2x − log2(x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4 = 3log2x − (log2(x + 2) + log2(x − 3) + log2(y − 6)4)
  • Apply property (2) to the very last term
  • = 3log2x − (log2(x + 2) + log2(x − 3) + 4log2(y − 6))
  • Distribute the negative
log2( [(x3)/((x + 2)(x − 3)(y − 6)4)] ) = 3log2x − log2(x + 2) − log2(x − 3) − 4log2(y − 6)
Simplify
log2( [(x3z4)/((x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4)] )
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Begin by applying property (3)
  • log2( [(x3z4)/((x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4)] ) = log2x3z4 − log2(x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4
  • On the first term, apply property (1) followed by property (2)
  • 3log2x + 4log2z − log2(x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4
  • First half is done, now apply property (1) to the third term
  • 3log2x + 4log2z − log2(x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4 = 3log2x + 4log2z − (log2(x + 2)4 + log2(x − 3)2 + log2(y − 6)4)
  • Apply property (2) to the very last three terms
  • = 3log2x + 4log2z − (4log2(x + 2) + 2log2(x − 3) + 4log2(y − 6))
  • Distribute the negative
log2( [(x3z4)/((x + 2)4(x − 3)2(y − 6)4)] ) = 3log2x + 4log2z − 4log2(x + 2) − 2log2(x − 3) − 4log2(y − 6)
Write as a single logarithm
2log37 + log311 − [1/3]log32
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence using rule (2)
  • 2log37 + log311 − [1/3]log32 = log372 + log311 − log32[1/3]
  • Condense uring rule (1)
  • log372 + log311 − log32[1/3] = log3(72*11) − log32[1/3]
  • Condense using rule (3)
  • log3(72*11) − log32[1/3] = log3[((72*11))/(2[1/3])]
  • Simplify
log3[((72*11))/(2[1/3])] = log3[(49*11)/(3√{2})] = log3( [539/(3√{2})] )
Write as a single logarithm
2log3(x − 2) + log3(x + 6) + 3log3(x − 4) − [1/3]log3(y + 2)
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence using rule (2)
  • 2log3(x − 2) + log3(x + 6) + 3log3(x − 4) − [1/3]log3(y + 2) = log3(x − 2)2 + log3(x + 6) + log3(x − 4)3 − log3(y + 2)[1/3]
  • Condense uring rule (1)
  • log3(x − 2)2 + log3(x + 6) + log3(x − 4)3 − log3(y + 2)[1/3] = log3(x − 2)2(x + 6)(x − 4)3 − log3(y + 2)[1/3]
  • Condense using rule (3)
  • log3(x − 2)2(x + 6)(x − 4)3 − log3(y + 2)[1/3] = log3[((x − 2)2(x + 6)(x − 4)3)/((y + 2)[1/3])]
  • Simplify
log3[((x − 2)2(x + 6)(x − 4)3)/((y + 2)[1/3])] = log3[((x − 2)2(x + 6)(x − 4)3)/(3√{(y + 2)})]
Solve
log75 + log75x2 = 2
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (1)
  • log75 + log75x2 = 2 = > log75*5x2 = 2
  • log725x2 = 2
  • You now have two options: re - write equation in exponential form or find the logyx that equals 2.
  • I'll solving by writing into exponential form
  • 72 = 25x2
  • 49 = 25x2
  • x2 = [49/25]
x = ±√{[49/25]} = ±[7/5]
Solve
log4(x + 5) − log4x = 2
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (3)
  • log4(x + 5) − log4x = 2 = > log4( [(x + 5)/x] ) = 2
  • log4( [(x + 5)/x] ) = 2
  • You now have two options: re - write equation in exponential form or find the log4x that equals 2.
  • I'll solve by writing into exponential form
  • 42 = [(x + 5)/x]
  • 16 = [(x + 5)/x]
  • 16x = [(x + 5)/] = 16x = x + 5
  • 15x = 5
  • x = [5/15] = [1/3]
This answer is a valid answer because by pluging into the original equation does not lead to a negative number.
Solve
log2x + log2(x + 36) = log276
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (1)
  • log2x + log2(x + 36) = log276 = > log2x*(x + 36) = log276
  • log2x*(x + 36) = log276
  • Since both logs on the left and right side of the equation have the same base, we can continue without the logs.
  • x(x + 36) = 76
  • x2 + 36x = 76
  • x2 + 36x − 76 = 0
  • Factor x2 + 36x − 76 = 0
  • (x + 38)(x − 2) = 0
  • Solve using the Zero Product Property
  • x = − 38
    x = 2
By inspection, you can see that x = − 38 is an erroneous solutions to log2x + log2(x + 36) = log276
since ther will be a negative inside the first term. Since that can't happen, the only solution is x = 2
Solve
log7x − log7(x + 1) = log711
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (3)
  • log7x − log7(x + 1) = log711 = > log7[x/((x + 1))] = log711
  • log7[x/((x + 1))] = log711
  • Since both logs on the left and right side of the equation have the same base, we can continue without the logs.
  • [x/(x + 1)] = 11
  • [x/] = 11(x + 1)
  • x = 11x + 1
  • − 1 = 10x
  • x = − [1/10]
  • By inspection, you can see that x = − [1/10] is an erroneous solutions to log7x − log7(x + 1) = log711
  • since ther will be a negative inside the first term.
No Solution
Solve
log92 − log9( − 5x) = log939
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (3)
  • log92 − log9( − 5x) = log939 = > log9[2/(( − 5x))] = log939
  • log9[2/(( − 5x))] = log939
  • Since both logs on the left and right side of the equation have the same base, we can continue without the logs.
  • [2/( − 5x)] = 39
  • [2/] = 39( − 5x)
  • 2 = − 195x
  • x = − [2/195]
  • By inspection, you can see that x = − [2/195] is not an erroneous solutions to log92 − log9( − 5x) = log939
  • since there will not be a negative inside the second erm.
x = − [2/195]
Solve
log46 − log4( − 4x) = log467
  • Recall that there are three properties of logs
  • 1)log(m*n) = log(m) + log(n)
  • 2)log(mn) = nlog(m)
  • 3)log( [m/n] ) = log(m) − log(n)
  • Condence the left side using property (3)
  • log46 − log4( − 4x) = log467 = > log4[6/(( − 4x))] = log467
  • log4[6/(( − 4x))] = log467
  • Since both logs on the left and right side of the equation have the same base, we can continue without the logs.
  • [6/( − 4x)] = 67
  • [6/] = 67( − 4x)
  • 6 = − 268x
  • x = − [6/268] = − [3/134]
  • By inspection, you can see that x = − [3/134] is not an erroneous solutions to log46 − log4( − 4x) = log467
  • since there will not be a negative inside the second erm.
x = − [3/134]

*These practice questions are only helpful when you work on them offline on a piece of paper and then use the solution steps function to check your answer.

Answer

Properties of Logarithms

Lecture Slides are screen-captured images of important points in the lecture. Students can download and print out these lecture slide images to do practice problems as well as take notes while watching the lecture.

  • Intro 0:00
  • Product Property 0:08
    • Example: Product
  • Quotient Property 2:40
    • Example: Quotient
  • Power Property 3:51
    • Moved Exponent
    • Example: Power
  • Equations 5:15
    • Example: Use Properties
  • Example 1: Simplify Log 11:17
  • Example 2: Single Log 15:54
  • Example 3: Solve Log Equation 18:48
  • Example 4: Solve Log Equation 22:13

Transcription: Properties of Logarithms

Welcome to Educator.com.0000

We are going to continue our discussion of logarithms by exploring some properties of logarithms.0002

The first one is the product property: if you have a logb(mn), that is equal to the logb(m) + logb(n).0008

And this might look familiar to you, or this general concept, from working with exponents.0022

Recall that, when you are multiplying two exponents with the same base, you add the exponents.0026

Since logs are a type of exponent, it stands to reason that there would be similarities.0032

So, you are going to see some similarities between the properties we are going to cover today and properties from working with exponents.0040

For example, log9(10) = log9...and I could break this out into factors, 5 times 2...0046

equals the sum of the log of this factor, plus this factor...so the sum of log9(5) and log9(2).0059

Or I could move, instead of from left to right, from right to left.0075

And instead of breaking it apart into 2 separate logs, I may have to combine it into a single log.0079

And combining into a single log is especially helpful when we move on to solving more complex logarithmic equations0084

than the ones we have seen in previous lessons.0091

For example, given log6(5) + log6(7), I may want to combine those.0095

And this would be equivalent to log6...since these have the same base;0105

notice that they have to have the same base for this to work...of 5 times 7, which equals log6(35).0110

This, of course, applies when we are working with variables, as well--with logs involving variables, which is a lot of what we are going to be doing.0120

So, log8(x2 - 36)...I could factor this into log8(x - 6) (x + 6),0128

and then write it as the sum of log8(x - 6) + log8(x + 6).0141

And again, I can move from right to left: if I were given this, I could multiply these two and then combine this into a single logarithm.0149

The quotient property: again, you are going to notice similarities from your work with exponents.0160

If I have logb of the quotient m/n, this is equal to the difference between the log of the dividend and the log of the divisor.0165

Given log2(14/5), I could rewrite this as log2(14) - log2(5).0180

Again, this works when we are talking about logarithms with variables (algebraic logarithms).0197

log3 of something such as (x2 - 3)/y would be equal to log3(x2 - 3) - log3y.0203

So, the log of the dividend minus the log of the divisor--that is the quotient property.0221

The third property we are going to cover is the power property.0232

This one is a bit different that what you have probably seen before.0236

But it states that logb of m to the power p equals p times logb(m).0238

So, if you see what happened: we took this exponent up here and moved it to the front to become a coefficient.0245

Again, you are going to find this property helpful when you are trying to simplify logarithmic equations,0262

or when you need to work with equations to solve them, to be able to move back and forth between these two forms.0270

For example, log4(53): I am going to take this 3 and move it to the front.0278

It is going to become the coefficient: 3log4(5).0290

Or, another example using a variable: log3(x6) =...I pull this out in front...6log3(x).0297

Again, these properties can be used to solve logarithmic equations.0316

Earlier on, we talked about solving logarithmic equations where there was just a log on one side,0320

and situations where we had one log on each side of the equation.0326

Sometimes, however, you are given logarithmic equations where you have multiple logs on each side, sums and differences of logs...0331

And if they have the same base, then you can actually combine those, so that you end up with one log on each side.0339

And then, you can move on to use the techniques previously learned in order to solve those.0345

The product, quotient, and power properties are some extra steps that you might have to take before applying previously-learned techniques.0350

For example, given log7(4x + 50) - 2log7(3) = log7(x + 1) + log7(3),0357

I see that these all have the same bases, so I want to use the property where, if I get a log on one side0373

equal to the log of the other with the same base, then I can just say x = y.0388

But I need to get this into that form; so let's see what we can do to use these properties to combine them.0392

First, I see that I have a coefficient here; so I am going to use the power property.0400

And with the power property, we talked about how logb(mp) = plogb(m).0404

So, I was moving that power to the front to yield this form.0419

I can do the opposite, though: I can take this coefficient and move it up here and make it a power again.0426

And I am going to do that: so, this first log I am just going to keep the same for now: log7(4x + 50).0434

Here, I am going to turn this into log7(3), and I am going to put this back over here and raise the 3 to the second power.0444

That is the only power I have; so I am just going to work with that for now.0458

And I know that 32 is just going to be 9, so I can change that to 9 in this step: it is log7(9).0463

And then, I am going to apply the quotient property on the left, because I have the difference of two logs that have the same base.0482

Using the quotient property, I can rewrite this as the log7(4x + 50) divided by 9.0491

Recall that the quotient property (this was the power property up here) told me that, if I have logb(m/n),0502

that is going to equal logb(m) - logb(n).0519

So here, I am moving from right to left: I am taking these and combining them--that is what I am doing right here.0525

On the right, I am going to use the product property: the product property says that, if I have a logb of a product,0533

that is equal to the sum of the logs of those factors (logb(m) + logb(n)).0543

So, I am going to go ahead and combine these two into a single log, log7(x + 1)(3).0551

Now, I have gotten this in the form that I can actually solve, because I have a log on the left to base 7 and a single log in the right to base 7.0563

And if these are equal, then this expression must equal this expression.0571

Now, I just need to go ahead and solve: 4x + 50, divided by 9, equals...I am going to pull that 3 out in front: 3(x + 1).0575

So, I am going to multiply both sides by 9 to get 4x + 50 = 27(x + 1); 4x + 50 = 27x + 27.0587

I am going to go ahead and subtract a 4x from both sides to get 50 = 23x + 27.0603

Subtract a 27 from both sides: I will get 23 = 23x, so x = 1.0611

Now, I always need to check back and make sure that the solution is valid, because I want to make sure I don't end up taking the log of a negative number.0622

Checking for validity right here: I have log7(4x + 50).0628

Let x equal 1, and check that: log7(4(1) + 50); that is log7(4 + 50), or 54.0636

So, that is OK; let's look right here: the other one I have to check is log7(x + 1), which is log7(1 + 1), and that is just log7(2).0647

So, this one is valid; this is a valid solution.0661

We used this technique, but we had to take a bunch of steps prior to that in order to combine these into a single log on each side of the equation.0667

Before we go on to work some logarithmic equations, let's just talk about simplifying using the properties that we have already covered.0680

And when I am asked to simplify a logarithmic expression, that means that I want to get rid of quotients.0686

I don't want to be taking the log of any quotients, of any products, or of any factors raised to powers.0692

The first thing I am going to do is work with getting rid of this fraction bar.0700

And I am going to use the quotient property for that, because log6(x4y5),0706

divided by this polynomial expression down here, is going to be equal to...let's just say0712

that this whole thing is going to be equal to the log base 6 of the dividend (the numerator), minus log base 6 of the divisor.0723

So, logb(quotient) equals the log of the dividend, minus the log of the divisor.0752

All right, so I got rid of that fraction bar; I don't have any more quotients; but what I do have is a product.0768

I am going to apply the product property to just get rid of this right here.0774

Instead, I am going to say, "OK, I know that this equals the sum of log base 6 of this factor, plus log base 6 of this factor."0781

So, I have to remember that I have my negative sign out here; that is going to apply to each of these terms, once I split them apart.0799

That is log6(x - 3)3 + log6(y + 2)6.0806

All right, I still have one product (I don't have any quotients), so I am going to take care of this one next.0819

This is going to be equal to log6(x4) + log6(y5), minus0827

log6(x - 3)3, plus log6(y + 2)6.0841

Next, I am going to apply the power property.0849

And recall that the power property says that, if I have logb(mp),0853

that is going to be equal to p...this is going to turn into a coefficient...times logb(m).0863

So, I am going to take these powers and move them out front; that is going to give me 4log6(x4), plus0873

5 (that is going to go to the front, also) times log6(y), minus (3 is going to go out in front)0883

3log6(x - 3), plus...the 6 comes out in front...6log6(y + 2).0894

The last thing I want to do is move this negative sign and apply it to each term in here.0906

And that is as far as I can go with simplifying: 4log6...actually, this is gone now,0911

because we have pushed that out in front...plus 5log6y, minus 3log6(x - 3).0918

And then, the negative applies to this term, as well: minus 6log6(y + 2).0929

And this is simplified as far as I can simplify it.0938

I look here, and I no longer have the logs of any quotients; I don't have the logs of any products;0942

and I don't have the logs of any terms or expressions raised to powers.0948

Now, instead of expanding out the expression, I am going to do the opposite.0956

I am asked to write this as a single logarithm: so I am going to instead compress this into one logarithm--the opposite of what I did in the last question.0960

Let's start with the power property: I know that, instead of 3log4(x - 3),0970

I can rewrite this as log4(x - 3), and I am going to turn this into an exponent and write it that way.0975

Plus log4(x + 4): that is going to be raised to the fourth power.0985

Minus log4(x + 7): there is no coefficient there to turn into an exponent.0995

There is here, though: log4(x - 8); and this is going to be raised to the third power.1003

Now, I have the difference here, which means that I can combine this by using the quotient property.1010

I also, within these parentheses, have some addition; so I can use the product property to combine those.1019

And I want to start inside the parentheses; so let's go ahead and do that and use the product property1027

to combine this into log4[(x - 3)3 (x + 4)4].1033

So, it's log base 4 of this times this, minus...here, also, I have a sum; so I can combine that1044

by taking the product of these two factors: log4[(x + 7)(x - 8)3].1056

So, this is this minus this; I can actually leave these brackets off at this point, because I have a single log.1068

Now, we have to apply the quotient property, because we have a difference.1079

This is log4 and log4; and this is going to become the numerator--it is going to become the dividend.1089

(x - 3)3(x + 4)4, divided by (x + 7)(x - 8)3...this is all together.1098

I have written this as a single logarithm, first by applying the power property,1111

then by combining these two logs and these two logs, using the product property,1117

and then finally combining this log and this log, using the quotient property.1122

Now, we are going to apply what we have learned to actually solving logarithmic equations.1129

And we have a technique for solving an equation, as long as we have a single log on each side.1134

I need to combine this side, and I need to also get rid of this 1/2 out in front,1139

so that I can have something of the form logb(x) = logb(y),1145

and then use the property that y must equal x.1151

First, I am going to apply the power property to get rid of these coefficients.1156

log9(23) - log9(2x - 1) = log9(491/2).1161

So, I can do some simplifying: I know that log9(23)...that 2 cubed is 8, so that is log9(8).1176

Now, 491/2 = √49, which equals 7; so I can write this as log9(7)--it is already looking more manageable.1186

On the left, I need to combine these; and I can do that using the quotient property.1199

log9...this is going to go in the numerator, and this will be the denominator.1203

So, this is log9(x) divided by 2x - 1 equals log9(7).1211

Once I am at this point, I have this situation, where I have the same base, and I only have one logarithmic expression on each side.1221

So, I can just say, "OK, x equals y, so 8 divided by 2x - 1 equals 7."1229

I am going to multiply both sides by 2x - 1, which is going to give me 8 = 14x - 7.1236

I am going to add 7 to both sides to get 15 = 14x, and then I am going to divide both sides by 14: so 15/14 = x, or x = 1 and 1/14.1250

It is important that I check the solution; so I want to make sure that I don't end up taking the log of a negative number.1265

And the only log here that has variables as part of it is this one, so I am checking log9(2x - 1), and I am letting x equal 15/14.1271

log9(2) times 15 times 14, minus 1...1284

Now, instead of figuring out this whole thing and subtracting all of that, all I have to do is say,1291

"All right, this is slightly more than 1; so 2 times slightly-more-than-one is going to be slightly more than 2."1297

If I take a value of slightly more than 2 and subtract 1 from it, I am going to be fine; I will have a positive number.1305

I will not be taking the log of a negative number, so this solution is valid.1314

You don't have to get the exact value; you just have to check it far enough to be sure that what you have in here,1320

what you are taking the log of, is not negative; it is greater than 0.1324

OK, Example 4: we are asked to solve a logarithmic equation, and we almost have this form, but not quite.1335

I can't use x = y, because I have this 1/2 here.1346

In order to combine these two, they have to have the same base.1352

In order for us to use the product property to combine these two logs into one, I have to somehow make 1/2 into log16.1355

So, my goal is log16--that I am going to turn 1/2 into that.1366

Well, let's think about this: if I think about my definition of logarithms, I have logb(x) = y.1376

And what I want is log16 of some number (but I don't know what number) is going to equal 1/2,1389

because then, if I have this, instead of writing 1/2 here, I will just write this.1395

Thinking of my definition of logarithms and how I can use that to solve an equation like this,1401

an equation with a log in one side: now I have a separate equation that I need to solve in order to solve this one,1407

just to substitute there: well, recall that logb(x) = y if by = x.1414

So, I am going to solve this by converting it into its exponential form,1424

which is going to give me 161/2 = x.1431

This is the same as √16, which is 4; therefore, log16(4) = 1/2.1438

These are equivalent; since these are equivalent, I can write that up there--I can substitute.1450

Now, my next step is to combine these two logs on the right, using the product property.1469

log16(12x - 21) = log16[4(x2 - 3)].1476

Now, I have it in this form, and I can say, "OK, 12x - 21 = 4(x2 - 3)."1491

And then, I just solve, as usual: this is going to give me 12x - 21 = 4x2 - 12.1500

I have a quadratic equation; I need to first simplify; so let's subtract 12x from both sides.1512

I am going to set the whole equation equal to 0; that is -21 = 4x2 - 12x - 12.1520

I am going to add 21 to both sides to get 0 = 4x2 - 12x + 9.1527

I am going to rewrite this in a more standard form with the variables on the left.1540

Now, this is just a matter of solving the quadratic equation; and this is actually a perfect square: it is (2x - 3) (2x - 3) = 0.1546

And you can check this out to see that 2x times 2x is 4x2; 2x times -3 is -6x, plus -6x, is -12x; -3 times -3 is 9.1558

According to the product property, if 2x - 3 equals 0 (and these are the same, so I only have to look at one factor), then I will have a solution.1576

So, 2x = 3; if I solve for x, x equals 3/2.1585

x = 3/2; now, my last step--this is a potential solution--is that I need to go ahead and check it right here.1590

Let's let x equal 3/2; and we are going to insert that into log16(12x - 21).1599

So, x equals log16(12(3/2) - 21)...not x equals...log16...this cancels;1608

this becomes 1, and this is 6; this is 6 times 3, minus 21; so this is log16(18 - 21).1627

And that gives me log16(-18); therefore, this solution is not valid.1639

And since that is the only solution I have, there is no solution to this equation.1654

The only solution I came up with was an extraneous solution.1664

I solved this by first converting it to this form; and I did that by setting up an equation1668

where I figured out what x had to be for me to write 1/2 in the form log16.1676

And I used the technique of converting this to the exponential form 161/2 = x and solving for x.1682

That told me that log16(4) = 1/2; so instead of writing 1/2 here, I wrote log16(4).1690

Then I used the product property to combine the two logarithmic expressions on the right.1699

Then I used this property, and I set 12x - 21 equal to this expression, and solved, using factoring, a quadratic equation.1705

But then, I went and checked my solution and found that it was not a valid solution.1714

Thanks for visiting Educator.com; that concludes today's lesson.1720